2.1 – Student Enrolment and Profile
2.1.1 – Demand Ratio during the year
Name of the Programme | Programme Specialization | Number of seats available | Number of Application received | Students Enrolled |
MBA |
MBA |
60 |
60 |
27 |
Mtech | Power System | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Mtech | Thermal | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Mtech | VLSI | 18 | 10 | 7 |
Mtech | CSE | 18 | 8 | 7 |
B Tech |
ME |
120 | 120 | 110 |
B Tech |
EX |
120 | 120 | 96 |
B Tech |
EC |
120 | 98 | 78 |
B Tech |
CSE |
180 | 180 | 172 |
B Tech |
Civil Engg |
120 | 120 | 106 |
2.2 – Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1 – Student - Full time teacher ratio
Year | Number of students enrolled in the institution (UG) | Number of students enrolled in the institution (PG) | Number of fulltime teachers available in the institution teaching only UG courses | Number of fulltime teachers available in the institution teaching only PG courses | Number of teachers teaching both UG and PG courses |
2018-2019 |
567
|
50 |
128 |
12 |
140 |
2.3 – Teaching - Learning Process
2.3.1 – Percentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching with Learning Management Systems (LMS), E-learning resources etc.
Number of Teachers on Roll | Number of teachers using ICT (LMS, e-Resources) | ICT Tools and resources available | Number of ICT enabled Classrooms | Number of smart classrooms | E-resources and techniques used |
1 |
2
|
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
2.3.2 – Students mentoring system available in the institution? Give details.
Mentor Teaching Learning system to support slow learner and bright students equally. Mentoring is to support and encourage students to manage their own learning in order that they may maximize their potential, develop their skills, improve their performance and become the person they want to be. Mentoring is a powerful personal development and empowerment tool. It is an effective way of helping students to progress in their careers and is becoming increasing popular as its potential is realized. Faculty members are assigned with the responsibility of mentorship. Each mentor is allotted with 20-30 students. In first year, students on the basis of their percentage are grouped into two categories: students below 50 marks in 12th board are classified as weaker students and students above 50 as brighter students. From second year onwards the students who secure less than 5-CGPA in their Continuous Assessment or with more than 3 backlogs are
identified and considered as academically weak students. Others are considered as academically bright students. Slow learner students are given counselling for their career guidance. Bright students are encouraged to take up new challenges time to time. The parents are also informed about the progress report like result, attendance and performance of the
students. The students needing improvement are groomed not only for improving academic performance, but also given opportunity to showcase their skills through events, competitions etc and this helps to improve academic performance also.
Assistance for slow learner students:
? Mentors from time to time follow their progress and counsel them to attend the classes
? Subject handling Faculty members conduct remedial classes.
Faculty members inculcate theoretical concepts through model specimen/charts/ video lectures/ online lectures.
? Remedial classes are conducted for slow learner students
? Confidence is boosted by motivating them to participate in sports, NCC, NSS
and other activities.
2. Encouraging bright students
? Students securing First and Second rank in end semester examination are awarded with certificate.
? Student securing 100 attendances are also awarded by certificate.
? Students are motivated for attending workshops, seminars, and technical
contests.
? Students are encouraged to undergo internships
Impact analysis of Initiatives and Implementation of Mentor Teaching-Learning
system
? Based on the extra care/ initiatives taken for weak students their academic
performance improves.
? Based on the action taken, not only the academic performance is improved but they are also selected by the recruiters.
? Students participated in various activities and performed outstandingly in various national level technical and non technical contests
? Improvement is seen in assessment of weaker students.
Number of students enrolled in the institution | Number of fulltime teachers | Mentor : Mentee Ratio |
617 |
140 |
1:4 |
2.4 – Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1 – Number of full time teachers appointed during the year
No. of sanctioned positions | No. of filled positions | Vacant positions | Positions filled during the current year | No. of faculty with Ph.D |
160 |
113
|
27 | 140 | 16 |
2.4.2 – Honours and recognition received by teachers (received awards, recognition, fellowships at State, National, International level from Government, recognised bodies during the year )
Year of Award | Name of full time teachers receiving awards from state level, national level, international level | Designation | Name of the award, fellowship, received from Government or recognized bodies |
- |
00 |
- |
NIL |
2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1 – Number of days from the date of semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the year
Programme Name | Programme Code | Semester/ year | Last date of the last semester-end/ year-end examination | Date of declaration of results of semester-end/ year- end examination |
B Tech |
00 |
VIII SEM/IV YR |
15/05/2019 |
08/06/2019 |
B Tech |
00 |
VI SEM/III YR |
03/06/2019 |
10/07/2019 |
B Tech |
00 |
IV SEM/ II YR |
21/05/2019 |
30/07/2019 |
B Tech |
00 |
II SEM/ I YR |
01/06/2019 |
03/07/2019 |
2.5.2 – Reforms initiated on Continuous Internal Evaluation(CIE) system at the institutional level (250 words)
Institution carefully implemented the curriculum designed by the affiliating University, as per the curriculum of course each department implemented the course as per guidelines mention in the curriculum, each department makes semester wise continuous Internal evaluation in the institution. As per rules each department conduct internal assessment test and as per marks obtained, internal assessment can be done. Similarly Project assignment, Seminar, Theory assignment and practical assignment also evaluated by the rules of affiliating university. Above mention internal assessment activity is arrange in each semester. In test activity course given to students and examination department prepare a time table of internal assessment tests, as per time table students were present to attain the tests. Project assignment and seminar topic awarded to students , students makes search on particular topic and collect information about the projects , read it and write summary in their own language and submit to concern department then concern faculty makes assessment on it and award the marks to students. Seminar topic is also given to students, students prepare the concern topic then after faculty scheduled the date to delivered the seminar, as per scheduled dates students delivered the seminar in front of all students, concern faculty make assessment on it and awards the marks As per the guidelines first year course have only theory assignment activity, faculty of subject make assessment on it and awards the marks. In this way all faculty conducts the internal assessment examination and keep the record together, then after evaluation such activity data is submitted to university, and university declares the result of students.
2.5.3 – Academic calendar prepared and adhered for conduct of Examination and other related matters
The College follows the Academic Calendar prepared by the affiliating University. Exams are conducted as per the schedule (RGPV Examination Calendar) given by university. Internal evaluations are done by the college.
2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1 – Program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course outcomes for all programs offered by the institution are stated and displayed in website of the institution
https://www.icot.co.in/department-of-electronics-engineering
2.6.2 – Pass percentage of students
Programme Name | Programme Specialization | Number of students appeared in the final year examination | Number of students passed in final semester/year examination | Pass Percentage |
B Tech |
CE |
108 | 100 | 92.59 |
B Tech |
CSE | 152 | 151 | 99.34 |
B Tech |
EC | 48 | 46 | 95.83 |
B Tech |
EX | 84 | 82 | 97.61 |
B Tech |
ME | 110 | 104 | 94.545 |
2.7 – Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1 – Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design the questionnaire) (results and details be provided as weblink)